A team leader offers public recognition for a job well done, and one team member genuinely lights up while another seems authentically uncomfortable or indifferent. This genuine variation in how people respond to recognition is common and real, and understanding what actually explains it matters for leading a team well and offering recognition that genuinely resonates with each individual.
Why Recognition Genuinely Lands Differently for Different People
Individual differences in how people respond to recognition reflect real and authentic variation in personality, past experience, and personal values — not simply a matter of some people being more or less appreciative or gracious. This genuine variation means the same recognition, delivered identically, can land very differently depending on the actual person receiving it.
Genuine Factors That Explain Real Differences in Response to Recognition
Real differences in temperament around public attention, with some people genuinely energized by it and others genuinely uncomfortable. Real and authentic differences in temperament — introversion versus extroversion, comfort with public attention — genuinely affect whether recognition delivered publicly feels rewarding or genuinely uncomfortable, independent of how much someone values being recognised at all.
Genuine past experiences with recognition that shape current expectations and comfort levels. Real, past experiences with recognition — whether previous public acknowledgment felt genuinely positive, or was accompanied by unwanted scrutiny or awkwardness — authentically shape current comfort and response to new recognition, even when the current situation differs from the past one.
Real differences in what someone genuinely values being recognised for, which may not match what’s actually being offered. Genuine differences in what someone actually values being recognised for — specific skill, effort, outcome, growth — mean that recognition focused on the wrong dimension, even if well-intentioned, may not resonate as authentically as recognition aligned with what genuinely matters to that person.
Genuine cultural or personal values around individual attention versus collective or private acknowledgment. Real and authentic cultural or personal values around individual attention — some genuinely preferring collective team recognition, others preferring private acknowledgment — mean that the same recognition format can feel appropriate to one person and genuinely uncomfortable to another.
How to Offer Recognition Well Given This Genuine Variation
Notice honestly how a specific person seems to respond to different forms of recognition over time, rather than assuming uniform preference. Honest, ongoing attention to how a specific person seems to genuinely respond to different forms of recognition over time — rather than assuming a uniform preference across your whole team — helps you calibrate recognition that actually resonates with each individual.
Ask directly, where appropriate, about someone’s actual preferences for how they’d like their contributions acknowledged. Direct, honest questions about someone’s actual and genuine preferences for how they’d like contributions acknowledged — public or private, specific format — respect their authentic preference rather than assuming based on a general approach.
Offer recognition focused on what someone actually values being recognised for, rather than a generic dimension of praise. Genuine, specific recognition focused on what someone actually and authentically values being recognised for — their particular skill, their effort, their growth — resonates more meaningfully than generic praise that doesn’t reflect what genuinely matters to them.
Provide a genuine range of recognition formats across your team, rather than relying on a single, uniform approach. A genuine range of recognition formats — public and private, verbal and written, immediate and more considered — offered across a team, rather than relying on a single uniform approach, respects real individual variation in what actually resonates.
Why Assuming Everyone Wants the Same Kind of Recognition Often Backfires
It’s worth being direct that assuming everyone wants the same kind of recognition — typically modeled on what the leader themselves would genuinely appreciate — often backfires, since this assumption overlooks real and authentic individual variation, potentially making recognition feel awkward or unwelcome for people whose genuine preferences differ from the leader’s own.
Distinguishing Genuine Discomfort With a Recognition Format From Not Valuing Recognition at All
Consider honestly whether someone’s apparent discomfort is specific to the format of recognition, or reflects genuinely not valuing acknowledgment at all. Honest, careful consideration of whether someone’s apparent discomfort with recognition is specific to a particular format — public delivery, a certain style — or reflects genuinely not valuing acknowledgment of their contributions at all, helps you calibrate an appropriate response rather than withdrawing recognition entirely.
Notice honestly whether someone responds more positively to a different format of recognition, which would suggest format is the actual issue. Honest attention to whether someone responds more positively and authentically to a different format of recognition — private rather than public, written rather than verbal — helps confirm that format, rather than a general aversion to acknowledgment, is the genuine issue.
Adjusting Your Own Assumptions About Recognition Based on Your Own Preferences
Consider honestly whether your own genuine preferences for recognition are shaping assumptions about what others would also want. Honest, careful consideration of whether your own genuine and authentic preferences for how you like to be recognised are shaping assumptions about what others on your team would also genuinely want helps you avoid projecting your own preference onto people with genuinely different ones.
Remain genuinely open to adjusting your approach as you learn more about individual team members’ actual preferences over time. Genuine, ongoing openness to adjusting your recognition approach as you learn more about individual team members’ actual and authentic preferences over time — rather than settling on one fixed approach — respects that understanding deepens with genuine attention and relationship.
A Practical Scenario
A team leader notices genuine variation in how team members respond to public recognition — one person genuinely energized by it, another seeming authentically uncomfortable. Rather than assuming this reflects different levels of appreciation, she considers honestly the real, authentic differences that might explain this — recognising that individual temperament around public attention genuinely varies, independent of how much someone values being recognised at all.
She asks directly, where appropriate, about individual preferences for how contributions should be acknowledged, learning that the team member who seemed uncomfortable genuinely prefers private, written acknowledgment over public praise. She offers a genuine range of recognition formats across her team, calibrated to what she’s learned about each person’s actual preferences, rather than relying on a single uniform approach modeled on her own preference. Both team members feel genuinely and authentically recognised, each according to their real preferences — a direct result of understanding that individual variation in response to recognition reflects genuine and legitimate differences, rather than different levels of appreciation or graciousness.
Common Mistakes
Assuming everyone wants the same kind of recognition, typically modeled on the leader’s own genuine preference. This often backfires, since it overlooks real and authentic individual variation, potentially making recognition feel awkward or unwelcome for people whose genuine preferences differ.
Interpreting someone’s discomfort with a specific recognition format as not valuing acknowledgment at all. This can lead to withdrawing recognition entirely when the actual issue is format rather than a general aversion to acknowledgment, missing an opportunity to find what genuinely resonates.
Relying on a single, uniform recognition approach across an entire team, without noticing genuine individual variation. This fails to respect real differences in temperament, past experience, and personal values that authentically shape how recognition lands for different people.
Failing to ask directly about someone’s actual preferences, relying instead on assumption. This misses an opportunity to learn genuine, individual preference directly, rather than guessing based on a general approach that may not reflect what specifically resonates with that person.
Action Steps
- Notice honestly how a specific person seems to respond to different forms of recognition over time, rather than assuming uniform preference.
- Ask directly, where appropriate, about someone’s actual preferences for how they’d like their contributions acknowledged.
- Offer recognition focused on what someone actually values being recognised for, rather than a generic dimension of praise.
- Provide a genuine range of recognition formats across your team, rather than relying on a single, uniform approach.
- Consider honestly whether your own genuine preferences for recognition are shaping assumptions about what others would also want.
Key Takeaways
- Individual differences in response to recognition reflect real and authentic variation in personality, past experience, and personal values, not simply differences in appreciation.
- Temperament around public attention, past experiences with recognition, what someone values being recognised for, and cultural or personal values all explain real differences in response.
- Noticing individual response patterns, asking directly about preferences, focusing on what someone actually values, and offering a range of formats all help offer recognition well.
- Assuming everyone wants the same kind of recognition often backfires, since it overlooks real individual variation and can make recognition feel unwelcome for some.
- Distinguishing discomfort with a format from not valuing recognition at all, and remaining open to adjusting your approach, both matter for leading well given this variation.
Conclusion
Recognition genuinely motivates some people far more than others, making honest attention to individual variation valuable for leading a team well and offering recognition that actually resonates. Noticing how individuals respond to different recognition formats, asking directly about actual preferences where appropriate, focusing recognition on what someone genuinely values, and offering a range of formats across your team all help you recognise people in ways that genuinely land, respecting real and authentic individual differences rather than assuming uniform preference modeled on your own.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does public recognition motivate some people but make others uncomfortable?
Real differences in temperament around public attention genuinely affect whether recognition delivered publicly feels rewarding or uncomfortable, independent of how much someone values being recognised at all.
How can I figure out what kind of recognition actually works for each person on my team?
Notice honestly how they respond to different forms of recognition over time, and where appropriate, ask directly about their actual preferences for how they’d like their contributions acknowledged.
Does someone’s discomfort with public praise mean they don’t want to be recognised at all?
Not necessarily — consider honestly whether the discomfort is specific to the format, like public delivery, rather than reflecting a general aversion to acknowledgment of their contributions.
Should I use the same recognition approach for my entire team?
Generally not — a genuine range of recognition formats, calibrated to individual preferences, respects real variation in temperament and values better than a single, uniform approach.
Is it okay to ask people directly how they’d like to be recognised?
Yes, generally — direct, honest questions about actual preferences respect authentic individual variation, rather than assuming based on a general approach that may not fit everyone.
How can I avoid assuming everyone wants the same recognition I would want myself?
Consider honestly whether your own genuine preferences are shaping assumptions about others, and remain genuinely open to learning that individual team members have authentically different preferences.
Discover more from CMGuide
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.